Trading News

Significant progress has been made during the latest round of China-United States trade talks. Business leaders, analysts, and officials said that it could pave the way for a complete solution during the next-step of negotiations. They also conveyed that China has been opening up its economy to the rest of the world and is offering ample opportunities for various global investors.

The comment was made after the wrap-up of the latest round of talks between the United States and China in Washington on Thursday. According to the Chinese delegation, it is reported that both the sides had specific and constructive discussions covering topics such as technology transfers, protection of intellectual property rights, trade balance, and non-tariff barriers. The Chinese delegation said, “Important progress has been achieved in the current stage, and the two sides had candid, specific and constructive discussions.”

According to a Xinhua News Agency report, Vice-Premier Liu He met with United States President Donald Trump, who assured that a United States trade delegation would visit China in the middle of February for further negotiations. It added that the United States delegation is to be led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.

Liu and Lighthizer were the ones who lead the two-day talks that happened in Washington on Wednesday morning. They were accompanied by dozens of other senior officials from both governments.

During the talks both the sides also determined the road map and timetable for next-step consultations. Both the United States and the Chinese delegation attached massive importance to the issue of technology transfers and IPR protection and accepted to improve the cooperation in this regard further.

The president of the US-China Business Council, Craig Allen said, “We understand that this week’s discussions covered familiar ground on structural issues and looked forward to hearing details about any progress that was made.” Craig Allen led council, in a statement has advised both the governments to use this month to address their unsettled issues.

The Chinese delegation said that creating a market environment of fair competition aligns with the direction of China’s opening-up and reform and therefore, China will look forward to addressing relevant US concerns.

Chinese delegation went on to add that both the countries have concurred to take adequate steps to engage in the more balanced development of bilateral trade. China will be making active efforts to expand imports from the United States in manufacturing, energy, agriculture, and services. This in return will help the country’s goal of high-quality economic development and also meet the people’s demand for a better life.

Craig Allen said it’s evident that changes to the bilateral commercial relationship are going to happen. But due to the complexity of the issue, it might take considerable time and hard work to resolve them.

The president for Asia-Pacific of the United States agricultural conglomerate Cargill Inc, Robert Aspell said that the best way to resolve trade issues is communicating with each other and finding a solution. “A large number of global companies have invested in China; it is a clear signal that China is going to open its markets further, and many opportunities can be found in different sectors across the country,” he commented.

Experts say that with collaborative efforts, both the United States and the Chinese economies can improve and could also increase the supply chain and global economy in 2019. The economies of both United States and China are strongly interconnected and that a blow to anyone would most likely make an impact in the other said Bai Ming who is the present deputy director at the International Market Institute of the Beijing-based Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation. Chen Wenling, the chief economist at the China Center for Economic Exchanges, said, “The United States needs Chinese goods as much as China needs equipment and agricultural products from the United States.”

Company News

As per a recent news correspondence, a lawyer has been appointed by a Nova Scotia’s court in Canada to have access to the encrypted laptop of the deceased CEO, Gerald Cotton of QuadrigaCX, which is a major Canadian crypto exchange. The laptop which is believed to provide access to $190 million of QuadrigaCX customer funds has been currently handed over to someone for monitoring. The Court has appointed a monitor, Ernst & Young Inc., an independent third party to oversee these proceedings, so that customer obligations are addressed. Even, creditor protection has been filed which would allow to work diligently through the process and ensure the viability of the company. The laptop was previously held by QuadrigaCX representatives.

QuadrigaCX which is a cryptocurrency exchange, or a digital currency exchange (DCE) provides its customers services for the exchange of virtual currency into various assets, such as fiat or other digital currencies. The platforms usually work solely online, providing transactions in electronic forms and taking fees for them, though there are also some brick-and-mortar businesses that use traditional payment methods. Debit and credit cards, postal money orders and other kinds of money transfers are accepted to make an operation using a DCE.

Currently, the assets are stored in a cold wallet, and the court believes this QuadrigaCX case is not a case of typical bankruptcy. The creditors have the rights to consider changing the jurisdiction to proceed with the case in future.

This week the company has been asked by the court to appoint one of the ‘Big Four’ auditing firm, the Ernst & Young as an independent third party to follow up and monitor the proceedings. Ernst & Young (EY) which is a British auditing and consulting company would be following up the company financials. In terms of cryptocurrency, EY representatives have a positive attitude toward the technologies of blockchain and digital currency. Unlike the other three companies in the Big Four, EY supports the Bitcoin community.

The QuadrigaCX management has asked for a month of stay for proceedings which is expected to end on Mar. 7. The investigation team would be searching almost $190 million which is apparently inaccessible following the death of Cotton. In the worst scenario, if the missing keys are not found, the lawyers representing QuadrigaCX would be looking forward to selling the company to satisfy the debts.

Recently, QuadrigaCX which is a Canadian cryptocurrency exchange had to face financial difficulty since the death of the CEO, Gerald Cotten who reportedly died of complications from Crohn’s disease.

One of the leading publications in Canada has published the death certificate and have expressed their concerns about Cotten’s death. The users do not have access to its wallets, and the CEO has not left evidence of passwords.

Opinion & Analysis

Kraken is a giant cryptocurrency exchange based out of US and is operating in Canada, the EU, Japan, and the US, and it is the largest Bitcoin exchange in Euro volume and liquidity. Recently, the company made a huge announcement about the acquisition of cryptocurrency facilities. This will restructure the entire company to rank between 1 and 10 in the global bitcoin exchange. Currently, they are the 46thexchange by adjusted volume.

Kraken released details about the acquisition to the press, but they had not mentioned the exact amount spent on crypto facilities. They hinted the cost to be a “nine-digit figure” which amounts to $100 million at the least. This move of acquisition took the market by surprise as there was news about the company downsizing last year. CEO of Kraken, Jesse Powell, cleared the air confirming the dismissal of 57 employees in Halifax. However, he stated that the company was still hiring in various sectors.

Furthermore, Kraken has stepped into Bitcoin Derivatives space. This could be given the success of its #10 competitor Huobi Global, a cryptocurrency exchange based out of Singapore, which proliferated after launching the derivatives market in November last year. Instead of creating its platform, Kraken has used Google’s approach and procured the best derivative platform and have put them to use for their clients.

Crypto facilities are based in London, and as seen by the UK’S financial conduct authority, the firm will be functional from its base country and benefit from the oversight of the authority. Even though the company operates from London, the future of the product will be Kraken branded.

Crypto facilities have taken a step forward and introduced a Revenue Sharing Program (RSP) for the clients who provide liquidity. This program calculates the contribution from clients on a weekly basis, starting at 12 p.m. UTC ( Universal Time Coordinated) every Friday. RDP is scheduled to run for ten weeks initially, and at the end of each week, the revenue will be calculated according to the contribution and paid out. $50,000 a week is allotted to the clients who create markets in the exchange.

Unlike stock market and share prices, the price of crypto asset originates from spot trading. Hence, the derivative market is effective only in a limited period. Even so, the sentiment value on a derivative market has the power to affect the price of an asset, which means, if the derivative values an asset more or less than your value, you will have to change your value and the price to trade it.

Virtually, the value of derivative exchanges is unlimited. For-profit, the Bitcoin derivatives, and its competitors are offered higher prices, depending on the volume, the offered price could be extreme. Binance’s founder, ChangpengZhao mentioned that the crypto market grows rapidly (could increase by 1000 folds)and hence makes the derivatives market bigger. BitMEX proved Changpeng right by trading for $1 billion on an everyday basis, making it the largest exchange in the derivatives market. Kraken is now following the steps of both BitMEX and Huobi, therefore, would emerge as a giant exchange with more innovations and profit in the future.

News

US Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a notice in which it is looking for various Blockchain analytics companies to provide blockchain data and its analysis.

SEC is looking for a potential blockchain company that can provide blockchain data to encourage its risk monitoring and compliance improvement. Also, SEC expects this blockchain company to inform the commission about digital assets.

Earlier in the last month, SEC declared that cryptocurrencies were among one of the most examination preferences for the past year.

Furthermore, SEC is looking for potential sources that can encourage the objective of acquiring data for the mostly used blockchain ledgers that include transaction information. Also, SEC wants these sources to provide data as well as convert this data into a simple form that can be reviewed easily.

US Securities and Exchange Commission requests information related to data extraction, verification and conversion procedure. Moreover, an agency is also requesting these potential sources to look at their ability to estimate insights from the blockchain data that is available to them. These insights include recognizing the owners of the crypto addresses.

Notice further states that companies who are willing to respond to US SEC should write an email to the agency before 14th Feb. And SEC requests all the participating companies to mention their capabilities.

Earlier in the August month of the year 2018, An agent working in the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) noticed that agency could track the cryptocurrencies that are more focused on privacy. Agent says that blockchain provides us so many tools by which we can easily recognize people. She further states that she wishes all the people keep using blockchain.

Scott Kupor, a Managing Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, also advised in June month of 2018 that popular cryptocurrency Bitcoin is the best friend of the law compliance. This is because it can track illegal transactions on the blockchain.

The blockchain is a digital ledger that records any kind of transaction that cannot be tampered. Moreover, all the transactions can be tracked easily. So, being an immutable and digital asset blockchain has been the most popular technology of this decade.

This innovative technology is revolutionizing industries from various sectors such as healthcare, logistics, medicines, and finance.

Company News

A report published by Markets Insider reveals that Nvidia has earned a whopping $1.95 billion in revenue via its crypto business. However, the official financial statement of the company has claimed a crypto-related revenue of $602 million. RBC analyst, Mitch Steves, told that the actual number is at least three times higher.

“We think NVDA generated $1.95 billion in total revenue related to the crypto/blockchain. This compares to company’s statement that it generated around $602 million over the same period,” Steves alleged.

During the third quarter of 2018, Nvidia chief financial officer Colette Kress said to its investors to not expect any revenue from its crypto business. And at the time, the company’s shutdown of its cryptocurrency venture caused a decline in its stock price.

In August, Kress said, “We believe we’ve reached a normal period as we’re looking forward to essentially no cryptocurrency as we move forward. Our revenue outlook had anticipated cryptocurrency-specific products declining to approximately $100 million, while actual crypto-specific product revenue was $18 million, and we now expect a negligible contribution is going forward.”

During the past five months, however, a majority of analysts have associated the decline in the performance of the company to the 85 percent fall of the cryptocurrency market.

Nvidia CFO Colette Kress has emphasized in August that it pulled out of the crypto sector. Now, the narrative that the correction in the cryptocurrency market is hurting the firm’s numbers has elevated.

RBC recently published a report that revealed that the company’s ties with the crypto market are deeper than how they were initially presented late in 2019. RBC analyst Mitch Steves added that the revenue Nvidia generated from its crypto mining equipment manufacturing business from April 2017 to July 2018. The revenue is ascertained to be over $2.75 billion.

However, Steves suggested that the numbers cannot be fully confirmed and that Nvidia has 75 percent control over the GPU-related crypto mining market. Between January 25 to January 29, the stock price of Nvidia fell from $160.15 to $131.6, which is more than 18 percent. Such a large short-term drop in market valuation is unprecedented. However, throughout the past month, analysts claimed that the overall decline in demand for Nvidia’s gaming GPUs affected the firm’s performance negatively rather than the struggling crypto market.

In another report by the Motley Fool, it was alleged that gamers are not compelled to purchase Nvidia’s high-performance GPUs because of three factors:

  • Most popular PC games are not graphically intensive
  • New GPUs do not have killer features
  • Gamers are not upgrading GPUs as frequently as before

A games, esports, and mobile market research firm, Newzoo, mentioned that the most sought out GPUs in the market are the GTX 1060, GTX 1050 Ti, and GTX 1070.

Nvidia challenged AMD, a graphics card manufacturer, in taking control of the low-end GPU market. Nvidia was successful in doing so, and this led to an overall decline in demand for high-end and expensive GPUs, a market where Nvidia is claimed to dominate.

It seems that the struggle of graphics card manufacturers has not been exclusive to Nvidia alone. Even AMD and smaller GPU makers have displayed poor performance throughout the last quarter of 2018.

Nvidia first started to show signs of underperformance in December 2018. During this period, CNBC Mad Money host Jim Cramer claimed that it was a forecasting mistake that caused Nvidia’s stock to drop rather than variables like the crypto market.

“Nvidia still makes the best graphics chips, which have become more powerful than traditional microprocessors. It still has a lead over the competition in a lot of uses, although you could argue that AMD’s catching up to them in the data center while Intel rivals them in self-driving vehicles. I think Nvidia made an honest forecasting mistake, although given that some of us saw it coming, it was definitely an avoidable mistake,” Cramer added.

Opinion & Analysis

Two doctors from Louisiana requested for a stay for the abortion law from the U.S. Supreme Court. They say that the law could cripple the access to abortion in the state. The law requires doctors who are about to perform the abortion to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinic, which means that it would potentially leave only one doctor in a single clinic to provide abortions in a state where about 10,000 women seek the procedure each year.

The application was submitted to Justice Samuel Alito and is expected to be reviewed by the full court. The unnamed physicians, represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights requested the court to prevent the law from going into effect since it is planned to go for trial next week. Alito gave the state of Louisiana two days to respond to the application. This case could prove to be a test for the President Donald Trump’s Nominee to the high court

In a similar law that was enacted in the state of Texas in 2016, it was ruled 5-3. This case was decided before Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch and was confirmed to the bench.

The law states that for an emergency stay to be sanctioned, five justices are required. If the full court joins and acts on the matter, so then at least one of the court’s five conservatives must join the liberal wing for the order to prevent the Louisiana law from being established.

This application follows the decision from a divided panel of the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that Whole Women’s Health does not preclude the Louisiana law “unlike in Texas, the Louisiana law does not impose a substantial burden on a large fraction of women.”

In Texas, the panel concluded that almost all hospitals require a doctor to admit a minimum number of patients, to retain the admitting privileges. On the contrast in Louisiana, only a few numbers of hospitals have the same requirement. Judge Jerry Smith also wrote that the panel’s majority opinion reasoned that driving distances will not increase the number of women seeking abortions and that only 30 percent of women seeking abortions might be affected.

Smith wrote, “we are of course bound by WWH’s holdings, announced in a case with a substantially similar statute but greatly dissimilar facts and geography.”

In a disagreement, Judge Patrick Higginbotham criticized the majority stating “conclusions for which there is no support in the record” and also for rejecting “the district court’s well-supported findings.” Higginbotham also challenged the motive of the majority, hinting that there could be an alternative motive.

Suggesting a possible political intention, Higginbotham wrote: “In the absence of fit between the means requiring admitting privileges and the ends ensuring women’s health, I am left to conclude that, viewed objectively, there is an invidious purpose at play.” Another statement made by Center for Reproductive Rights CEO Nancy Northup said the law “could be the last straw for the few remaining clinics.” She also said that “Less than three years ago, the Supreme Court struck down an identical law in Texas, holding that it served no purpose other than to restrict access to safe and legal abortion. The Fifth Circuit has brazenly ignored this precedent squarely on point.”

Planned Parenthood also weighed in. “When courts blatantly disregard established Supreme Court precedent, every person’s rights and freedoms are threatened,” Helene Krasnoff, Planned Parenthood’s vice president of public policy litigation and law, said in a statement. “We stand by our partners at the Center for Reproductive Rights in their fight to get emergency relief for Louisiana patients. The unconstitutional nature of this law has been and should continue to be a foregone conclusion.”

Company News

Chinese tech giant Huawei’s chief executive has been charged with criminal charges for stealing trade secrets, misleading banks about its business and violating U.S. sanctions.

Huawei entirely denied committing any violation mentioned in the indictment. These charges were announced just before a critical two-day round of trade talks between China and the United States. Many trade analysts believe that these allegations could potentially dim the prospects for a breakthrough.

The tech giant has been accused of using paramount efforts to steal trade secrets from American businesses which include an attempt to remove a piece of a robot from T-mobile lab. The charged chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, was arrested in Canada last month, and the U.S. government is trying to deport her

Meng’s lawyer in Canada didn’t respond immediately to messages that seek comment. As of now, Meng is out on bail in Vancouver, and her case is said to be due back in court on Tuesday

Huawei is considered to be the world’s biggest supplier of network gear that is being used by phone and internet companies. The company has always been seen as a front for spying by the Chinese security services.

After the charges has been filed the company released a public statement saying “The company denies that it or its subsidiary or affiliate have committed any of the asserted violations of U.S. law set forth in each of the indictments,” it also added that Huawei is “not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms. Meng, and believes the U.S. courts will ultimately reach the same conclusion.”

On the other hand, China detained two Canadians soon after Meng’s arrest in an obvious attempt to pressure Canada for the release of Ms. Meng.

The Prosecutors who are handling Ms. Meng’s case say that Huawei was doing business in Iran through a Hong-Kong based company called Skycom and Meng has misled U.S. banks into believing that these two companies were separate.

Officials also claim that from the beginning of 2012, Huawei had created a plan to steal all information regarding T-Mobile’s robot, named “Tappy,” and the Huawei engineers clicked pictures of the robot, measured it and even tried to steal a part of it from T-Mobile’s laboratory in Washington state. When asked about the same to T-Mobile they declined to comment on the matter.

At a news conference with Attorney General, Matt Whitaker along with his cabinet officials commented: “As I told high-level Chinese law enforcement officials in August, we need more law enforcement cooperation with China, China should be concerned about criminal activities by Chinese companies, and China should take action.”

This case has set off diplomatic ruffle among the United States, China, and Canada. President Donald Trump commented that he would get involved in the Huawei case if it can help create a trade agreement with China. Eswar Prasad, an economics professor, and China expert at Cornell University along with other economists are worried that the criminal charges announcement made on Monday could potentially hamper the prospects of a deal.

Trading News

Earnings of China’s industrial firms have gone down further in December. This has placed a lot of pressure on policymakers to support the industries hurt by weak factory activity and slowing prices as a result of the U.S.- Sino trade war.

The dipping earnings point to troubled times ahead for China’s huge manufacturing sector which is already struggling with job layoffs, declining jobs, factory closures and so on. In fact, the Chinese economic growth is at its weakest in the past three decades.

The Chinese economy grew only 6.6 percent in 2018, and the growth is forecast to be even slower this year as a result of Beijing’s endeavors in reducing debt risks.  It has depressed the property market and as a result, slowed down the credit flow to the private sector.

Industrial profits saw a decline of 1.9 percent in December compared to the profit a year back. This decline was reported after a 1.8 percent decline in November, making the downward dip continue two months in a row. This is the first dip in profits in the last three years.

According to Tang Jianwei, at Bank of Communications in Shanghai, the declining trend will continue as the producer price index has also turned negative the previous month. When the PP becomes negative, it causes the industrial enterprises’ profits to go down as well. He also stated that the structure of corporate profitability would soon change.

Date released has shown that profits in coal mining, chemical as well non-ferrous metal sectors have all slowed down significantly. The profits of the entire year rose to only 10.3 percent or 6.64 trillion yuan in 2018 compared to the 21 percent rise in 2017.

Even upstream sectors like coal and metal mining, oil extraction. which command a larger share of the profits slowed down considerably in 2018.

According to Tang, rolling out the large-scale cuts promised by the Chinese government would help stall the declining industrial profits.

A recent survey showed that the activity of around 2500 small and mid-sized Chinese firms continued to contract in their fourth quarter in 2018, despite the many supportive government policies.

The Small and Medium Enterprises Development Index went down to 93, well below the 100-mark that marks the difference between growth and contraction.

A recent report stated that the latest measures by the Chinese government would provide support funding to private firms but will be limited, and the credit will be diverted to stronger private enterprises.

Stocks

In the on-going World Economic Forum, there are many insights available for the Global Economy. And as far as the market liquidity is concerned, negating the market assumptions the chief executive of Swiss bank UBS said market activity could freeze up quicker than expected.

Last month, the Dow and S&P 500 equity indices were their worst December performance since 1931, the era of the Great Depression. It was also the most significant loss on a monthly basis since February 2009.

With growing concerns about an economic slowdown and fears the Federal Reserve might be tightening conditions to a point where liquidity in markets could dry up stocks have started to degrade. Liquidity for the investors is the ability to sell an asset quickly and at a price close to where it last traded.

Speaking on Thursday, on a CNBC-moderated panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos, UBS chief executive officer, Sergio Ermotti, said a convergence of macro and political fears as well as a growing understanding that the financial system may not let investors move capital as quickly as before had led the December stock sell-off.

“The implied assumption that we hear about liquidity being there, being able to step in and function the leveling out tensions, is the wrong assumption, ” he said before adding “liquidity can freeze very easily, like the water in Davos. ”

He also said among its US investor base at the end of the fourth quarter in 2018, and the cash asset allocation was at an all-time high of 24 percent as much investors pulled back from the market.

“This is not liquidity that is there for reinvestment. This is there because people fear that things will go wrong,” he warned.

Ermotti said most of the world’s more prominent investors are now managing money for others and, unlike banks, they might not want to or able to trade an asset just to ensure markets run smoothly.

The CNBC moderated panel also included Mary Callahan Erdoes, J.P. Morgan’s asset & wealth management chief executive. Mary who also happens to sit on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Investor Advisory Committee said a lack of liquidity is “what we all worry about.”

Callahan Erdoes told at the WEF that an additional $11 trillion worth of assets had been pumped into the financial system since 2008 which led to the strange pricing levels in the market. For instance, the U.S. banker noted the situation in 2017 when 85 percent of the Italian high yield market was traded below the yield of U.S. Treasuries.

In a normal condition, the yield on U.S. Treasuries should be lower than Italian high yield as it is taken as a safer investment than the other.

But, as per the J.P. Morgan executive, the market anomalies noted will be solved as the capital will be redeployed, but he did not fail to warn that people could find danger amid a lack of market makers and a shortage in liquidity.

The rule followed by the Fed Reserve, the Volcker rule is post-crisis regulation to curb banks making big bets with their own money. It has been criticized heavily by banks as it aims to reduce market liquidity. But as per experts, it is a necessary piece of regulation to ensure that financial institutions cannot repeat the financial meltdown of 2008.

Callahan Erdoes said as the role of the banks and investment dealers as investor and market makers is diminishing, that place might be taken by the shadow banking system like private equity and hedge funds, to lubricate the wheels of the global market.

She said, “They have a lot of capital that could be deployed, but they are not going to go in to make markets in the way banks used to. They are going in as a fiduciary, to make money for their investors, and those are the dynamics that everyone is struggling with. ”

Company News

U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on Thursday advised the furloughed federal workers who would be facing a second missed paycheck to get loans to pay their pending bills. He also added he doesn’t understand why the federal workers have any issue availing loans.

Ross, who made a fortune buying distressed companies, said it was disappointing to see some federal workers not showing up to work after the shutdown.

Ross said, “So the 30 days of pay that some people will be out – there’s no real reason why they shouldn’t be able to get a loan against it, and we’ve seen some ads from the financial institutions doing that.”

He also added, “So there is not a good excuse why there really should be a liquidity crisis, true the people might have to pay a little bit of interest.”

Ross’s comments came as the most extended ever shutdown in the United States’ history entered into the 34th day.

President Trump on Ross’s comments said he had not heard anything about the comment, but he did understand.

“Perhaps he should have said it differently,” Trump told reporters during a trade meeting at the White House. “Local people know who they are when they go for groceries and everything else, and I think Wilbur was probably trying to say they will work along. I know that banks are working along. But he’s done a great job; I will tell you that.”

It should be reported here that the shutdown has affected around 800000 federal workers who have been furloughed. Many of them went to take the help of unemployment assistance, food banks or other work to try to make ends meet.

Democrats have reacted profusely to the comments of Ross.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asked at a news conference, “Is this the ‘Let them eat cake,’ kind of attitude, or ‘Call your father for money?’ or, ‘This is character building for you?’” She also added that Ross’s comment was unfortunate as hundreds of thousands of men and women would be missing a second paycheck in the coming day.

U.S. Representative Jennifer Wexton, whose northern Virginia district includes many furloughed workers and federal contractors, said she invited Ross to visit food bank with her to show him the real woes.

Wexton said, “That’s one thing that’s been so striking about this entire process is the complete lack of empathy from the president on down through his administration, a complete lack of understanding of what day-to-day life is for regular people in this district.”

This is not for the first time that one of the people in the Trump administration tried to downplay federal workers’ plight. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett compared the furlough to vacation in an interview last month. Though he later clarified his stand is saying he understands workers are in pain.

Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law and adviser to his 2020 re-election campaign, told online television outlet BOLD TV this week that the federal workers who had been furloughed were facing a little bit of pain to pay the bills, but they needed to make the sacrifice as the border wall, or national security is bigger than any one person.

She later explained on Fox News Channel on Thursday that she was extremely empathetic towards the furloughed workers, but her whole point was that the president had been standing firm on his position because this was really about the future of the United States, about fixing that immigration system.